The colloquium took place at the gorgeous campus of the University of Reading in Reading. Its aim was to promote Women in Computing and a range of students attended to present poster abstracts in four categories. The categories were first year, second year, final year (which incorporated third years and fourth years) and MSc. My category had thirty people in it as it covered two year groups. Throughout the day we listened to inspiring talks from women in the field and in academia. The range of topics of the talks and posters was vast and very interesting. It was attended by university students, industry and academics.

Standing beside my poster
Standing beside my poster

My poster was about my final year project - Seizure Pad. My younger brother was diagnosed with a rare form of epilepsy when he was four years old. From then, I have helped care for him. As technology has advanced, my mother has tried multiple methods to assist in managing his seizures. However, none were suitable enough. I began to do some research and found that she was not alone. That’s where Seizure Pad comes in.

The rise in ubiquitous computing has seen advancements in eHealth. From health care applications to Internet based health monitoring systems, there is a range of eHealth tools available for patients. For those with epilepsy, eHealth provides digital diaries and analytical tools to monitor seizures. However, these tools do not support those with complex epilepsy. Good management of complex epilepsy requires carers to log and analyse data about frequent seizures. Current eHealth is limited because the lack of user involvement in the design and development of applications has failed to identify and support the communication of complex data between the patients and clinicians, which in turn leads to poor overall support and management.

Seizure Pad was developed as a result of an experience driven design study following a participatory approach. It has involved working closely with a range of clinicians, patients and other users to ensure an inclusive support tool for those with complex epilepsy. By identifying the types of data to be recorded and providing an intuitive user interface, it presents a new framework to assist in seizure management. Seizure Pad offers customised input fields, automatic data capture and a clear analysis of the data. This visualisation of data empowers the patients to be more independent and contribute to their healthcare.

Currently the study has developed a prototype, which is being tested by end-users. I am hoping to conduct further research which will involve a randomised clinical trial of Seizure Pad to further test its impact on the communication divide and self-efficacy of the user.

Collecting my prize from EMC
Collecting my prize from EMC

I was humbled to have won the finally year category at the BCSLovelace Colloquium 2014 as the projects I was presenting alongside were amazing. EMC gave me a very generous cash prize of £300 and I also received a goody bag which included, among other things, a furry Android, which has been stolen by my cat, Bitcoin! Although this is the fifth conference to attend and fourth to present at, I found it the most enjoyable. Whereas the other conferences were focused on a particular topic of research, this one was so varied. Everyone I spook to had a completely different focus and project to my own. It was exciting as I rarely get to talk to students out with my own class, and never do I get to talk to some many fascinating women. Also, one of my biggest fears about joining the IT industry is my lack of interest in the more technical side. However, this conference showed me that I have nothing to fear as the variety of exciting positions available is far greater than I had previously thought! I think the most valuable thing I took away with me was that life is about risks, sometimes they work out other times they don’t but it’s just about finding out what works for yourself. As all the brilliant speakers said, if one job doesn’t feel right, look at a different area within IT for we are part of an ever changing industry!

Background

Over the last thirty years Alternative and Augmentative Communication (AAC) has become more accepted within society [2, 4]. Although still not perfect, the advances in technology has produced a range of devices that now allow users to lead fuller lives. However, AAC users often have other challenges in life in addition to communication difficulties. Other medical conditions and symptoms of the underling cause of a limited ability to communicate through vocal tracts presents these users with yet another barrier. For example, limited mobility, physical impairments and pain are a few additional challenges face by those who use AAC.

With these additional challenges comes an increase in feelings of isolation, lack of motivation and a feeling of being useless [2, 6]. This can further reduce the AAC user's quality of life [6]. During these times support is sought from a range of sources. Humans are sociable and seek support from others. This is especially the case when the person is struggling emotionally or physically.  Although there has been evidence for the benefits of face-to-face support groups [2, 6], typically speaking AAC users are often unable to benefit from these sources of support. Their limited mobility, inability to express themselves fully in a group setting or the distance required to travel to support centres restricts these users from seeking the additional care they need in this format [2, 4, 6].

eHealth

With the growing field of digital health care, or eHealth [7], technology is presenting new ways or assisting users in the medical field [3]. eHealth is a low cost method of assisting users in a mixture of support, including online forums. Online forums and pages can be found on websites and social media sites which support those with various conditions. These have been found to compliment the formal care provided by the National Health services [2, 3, 4, 6, 8]. They, and other eHealth tools, encourage the user to self manage their condition through self-efficacy [3, 4, 6] and create a community who truly understand what they are experiencing reducing the sense of isolation [4, 6].

However, the AAC users are often excluded from the full benefits of these digital support tools because of a lack of consideration from the developers of their additional needs. In the case of websites, the forums are often very difficult for AAC users to traverse []. The Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) [9] presents a set of guidelines to develop digital spaces that are inclusive. This solves some issues but focus more on the access of the information rather than the active participation of users in these support areas.

Research has demonstrated the benefits of a social community and its improved results compared to face-to-face groups [4, 6]. For an AAC user, ease of access from their home and textual based forms of communication are often easier. However, in order to try and navigate through the complex sites it is tiring and frustrating. This only strengthens the gap between the AAC user and the eHealth system.

User Centred Design

Bryen et al. [2] emphasise the need for web inclusivity and a new method of providing navigation support. When these assistive means are applied to support forums it presents an equal opportunity for AAC users to actively seek support from people in a similar position to themselves. Further research has proven the benefits to AAC users when systems are designed with them [1,6] as this helps ensure that their feedback creates a system that supports their needs, abilities and requirements.

User Centred Design is the methodology where the developers and designers focus on the end user’s needs during development. This involves participant meetings where requirements are acquired, the system is evaluated and feedback is given to the developers. Focus groups and interviews have been shown to aid in their process of understanding users, specifically AAC users [1,6, 8].  It highlights new areas perhaps unthought-of of by the developing team before which in turn creates a more functional tool [3, 4, 5, 8].

Discussion

eHealth can be largely beneficial to AAC users in supporting them in their daily management of the challenges that they face [4]. However, developers need to accommodate their additional needs in order to prevent a further exclusion from a support tool. Participant involvement is showing clear signs of improving eHealth tools for all users [1, 3 ,5, 6, 8] and can shape the design of the eHealth to be easier to access for AAC users.

In addition, improvements made to eHealth tools present another step towards better medical and emotional support [3, 4, 6]. The communication gap between medical staff and patients can be improved [3] and a more inclusive care plan given. It presents AAC users with more independence and a platform for self-management which has been shown to be beneficial to the coping process [4]. Sharing experiences and methods of managing daily challenges aids in improving the AAC user’s quality of life.

However, care must be taken when delivery a new tool. Thought must be given to the dexterity, knowledge and access needs of the users [3, 5, 8]. It is not simply enough to make an eHealth tool that is usable by those who are visually impaired. Other AAC users exist who use non-typical input devices, and who use a symbol based languages.

Conclusion

The WAI is a step forward in improving the accessibility but more usability consideration need to be considered when developing eHealth tools [4] especially those when developed on mobile devices [3, 4]. Developing systems which cater for those who have different needs widens the user group for a system and therefore the market value. If more user participation is involved in the development stages, eHealth can be used to bridge the communication and support gap between medical staff, carers and AAC users [2, 6]. This will have a positive effect on the quality of life [2, 3, 6] of an AAC user and generate a more robust support channel for a lower cost. However, this will only succeed if the users are involved through a participation driven development approach.

References

[1] Barratt A, Prior S, Waller A. Addressing Narrative Retrieval in Personal Narrative Systems. 15th Biennial Conference of the International Society for Alternative and Augmentative Communication (ISAAC), (Pittsburgh, PA, USA, July 28 - August 4, 2012).

[2] Bryen, J.N., Heake, G., Semenuk, A., and Segal, M., 2010, ‘Improving Web Access for Individuals who Rely on Augmentative and Alternative Communication’, Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2010, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 21-29.

[3] Ellis, H.R, 2013, ‘Seizure Frequency Analysis Mobile Application: The Participatory Design of an Interface with and for Caregivers’, CHI EA '13 CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp 2683-2688.

[4] Light, J. and McNaughton, D., 2012, ’The Changing Face of Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Past, Present, and Future Challenges’, Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2012, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 197-204.

[5] Maloney, D. and Preece, J., 2005, ‘A Multilevel Analysis of Sociability, Usability, and Community Dynamics in an Online Health Community’, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 201 – 232.

[6] Moore SKGuarino HAcosta MCAronson IDMarsch LARosenblum AGrabinski MJTurk DC, 2013, ‘Patients as Collaborators: Using Focus Groups and Feedback Sessions to Develop an Interactive, Web-Based Self-Management Intervention for Chronic Pain’, Pain Medicine 2013.

[7] Pagliari, C., Sloan, D., Gregor, P., Sullivan, F., Detmer, D., Kahan, J.P., Oortwijn, W., MacGillivray, S., 2005, ‘What Is eHealth (4): A Scoping Exercise to Map the Field’, Journal of Medical Internet Research 2005, Volume 7, Issue 1.

[8] Prior, S., Waller, A., Thilo, K., 2013, ‘Focus Groups as a Requirements Gathering Method with Adults with Severe Speech and Physical Impairments’, Journal Behaviour & Information Technology 2013, volume 32, Issue 8, pp 752-780.

[9] Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI). Available: http://www.w3.org/WAI/. (10th Nov 2013)